Blog  /  Compliance

Cosmetic Clinics: Social Media Is Where the Regulators Are Looking. Your Google Reviews Don't Have to Be.

· 27 October 2026 · 5 min read

If you run a cosmetic clinic, the marketing that feels most natural is probably the marketing that gets the most attention from regulators. Instagram, TikTok, a Story full of happy clients, a screenshot of a lovely message someone sent you. It all feels like normal business. It's also the corner of the industry where two regulators are paying close attention at once.

In January 2026 the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) issued 11 infringement notices totalling $43,560 to six people, three of them AHPRA-registered practitioners, for alleged unlawful importation and advertising of therapeutic goods. One allegedly advertised botulinum toxin on social media. The point isn't who they were. The point is that this part of the industry is being watched, and being a registered practitioner doesn't exempt anyone from either regulator's rules.

Here's the good news. Where your Google reviews sit is a very different situation from where your Instagram sits, and once you can see the line, it's easy to stay on the right side of it.

Two regulators, two sets of rules

It helps to keep these separate, because they're different regimes with different jobs.

The TGA regulates therapeutic goods, and that includes how they can be advertised to the public. For a clinic, the trap is usually naming a specific product, brand or prescription-only treatment in something promotional. A caption that feels like helpful information can be treated as an advertisement.

AHPRA and the National Boards regulate how registered health practitioners advertise their services. That includes a ban on using testimonials in advertising. In September 2025, AHPRA also brought in dedicated guidelines for cosmetic procedures. Among other things, they require real images rather than misleading edits, and they strengthen the ban on testimonials from social media influencers.

We're not going to walk through the cosmetic guidelines line by line. That's what AHPRA's Advertising hub is for, and it's worth a read. The takeaway for this article is simpler: two regulators, one lesson. Promotional content is where the scrutiny is.

Where Google reviews sit

A review a client leaves on Google is written by the client, in their own words, on a platform you don't control. AHPRA's guidance is clear that people sharing their views on review platforms independently isn't affected by the testimonial ban, and that advertisers aren't responsible for removing reviews published on platforms they don't control.

That's the starting position. A review sitting on your Google profile, left there by the person who wrote it, is generally not you advertising.

We've covered this in detail in our guide to AHPRA and Google reviews, so we won't repeat all of it here. For a cosmetic clinic, one idea does most of the work.

The line is reproduction

The moment you copy a review into something you control, it stops being just a client's review and becomes content you're publishing. Screenshot it into a Story. Paste it on your website. Quote it in an ad. Now it can be a testimonial your clinic is advertising with, and AHPRA's definition of a testimonial is broader than most people expect: a positive statement about the clinical side of a service, which includes outcomes and the practitioner's skill.

Same words, different publisher, different rules.

Selective editing is a separate problem. AHPRA's guidance warns that trimming a review so it gives a different impression of what the reviewer actually said can be misleading.

For a clinic, this is the most useful habit in the whole article: leave reviews where clients put them. A Google profile full of honest reviews, left alone, is public proof you haven't had to publish a single claim to earn.

What you can usually share is the overall picture. Your profile link and your star rating, stated as a plain fact about your listing, are widely treated as acceptable. AHPRA's guidelines don't address star ratings directly, so check your own position if you're leaning on it heavily.

Replying to reviews in a clinic

Replying is good practice. It shows every future reader that someone's paying attention. But a reply is your publication, so it carries your obligations, and in a cosmetic clinic the safe shape is narrow.

Thank the person. Keep it about the experience of the clinic, like the welcome, the team or how things were explained. Don't confirm what was done, don't describe what it achieved, and don't name a product. If something specific needs discussing, invite them to get in touch with the clinic directly. We've written how to reply well for any business; in a clinic, you just keep the clinical side out of it entirely.

Proof that doesn't need a claim

A steady, honest review profile is one of the calmest ways to build trust. It's the opposite of the high-pressure content that attracts attention. Newer clinics often wonder how many they need to look established, and we've looked at that in how many Google reviews your business actually needs. And if you also run treatments that sit closer to the salon side of beauty, where your next client is actually looking covers how people choose.

Ask everyone the same way, keep it neutral, and respect what Google's policies allow. Let the reviews fall where they fall.

Where the responsibility sits

This article is general information, not legal or compliance advice. The rules change, and your obligations depend on your registration, your board and exactly what you advertise. Check the current position with AHPRA's Advertising hub, the TGA, or your own adviser before you publish anything you're unsure about.

No tool takes that responsibility off you. What a tool can do is make the careful path the easy one. Gold Reviews' beauty setup for clinics with registered practitioners is configured so AI-drafted replies stay non-clinical, with no conditions, treatments, products or outcomes, and nothing is posted until you've read and approved it. It's assistance, not assurance. Our health setup follows the same approach for allied health practices.

Cosmetic clinics don't need to fear Google reviews. They need to leave them where clients put them, keep their replies simple, and let the regulators' attention stay on social media where it already is. If you'd like that handled without the second-guessing, see what Gold Reviews costs.

Leave reviews where clients put them

Gold Reviews' beauty setup for clinics with registered practitioners keeps AI-drafted replies non-clinical, and nothing is posted until you've read and approved it. It's assistance, not assurance.

Claim your founding spot →

$29/mo, locked in while you stay subscribed · 14-day free trial when your spot opens · No lock-in contract


This article is general information about advertising rules for registered practitioners, not legal or compliance advice. Rules change. For the current position, see AHPRA's advertising guidelines and AHPRA's testimonial tool, and verify your obligations with AHPRA, the TGA or your own adviser.

← Back to the blog